Skip to main content

We Need More Government Over Sight -- My Holiday Rant

Ah, Thanksgiving. Where many Americans don't have a clue what to be thankful for. Hey, try living in a third-world (or even second-world) country first.* Then you'll thank God you are an American, whether 8th generation or 1st. 

*Before you say I don't know what it's like to live in other countries (or even visit there) try Thailand, Panama (and not the beach), Turkey, Italy, Chile, Ecuador, etc...). I would add Germany, but there weren't third world when the wall came down in 1989, but they're getting there...). Try sitting on top of an M-113 in the jungle -- then have a little Thanks.  

Not to offend anyone, or even some, it is a holiday for families to come together. I have nothing wrong with that. Except for all the stories hear of the dreaded holidays spent with dysfunctional families. If yours isn't celebrate. Otherwise go to South Padre island. 

But back to my own rather nice get-together before the Turkey was served up, politics inadvertently came up -- my mistake to start a casual conversation -- as I was reading the Austin Statesmen American (or it is the American Statesmen? I really don't care, as I don't read the rag anyway.) But I let slip a quote from reprinted article about how Republicans want less government on  just about everything ... well can't remember which they wanted more or less of...probably something about Turkeys. 

I mentioned that was was a left-leaning publication, so it probably had some bias. 

"I'm a Democrat," says an attendee a the party, as if it was a badge of honor. Which answered most my questions.

"Oh. OK." Was my response. As far as I was concerned, end if story. But I had to ask: "So you believe in more government?" In reference to the article.

"I believe we must have government oversight."

"More oversight into what?"

"Consumer protection. We need more consumer protection."

"You do know I'm a Libertarian?"

"So you believe in not having any government," she stated. Statement, not question. 

"Or course we need government." But what more could I say? This very nice lady was so misinformed that I really didn't see the purpose of any future discussion, especially on T-Day. This supposedly well-education woman actually thought that being Libertarian meant no government. As if we're gun-toting red-necks from our compounds in the woods. 

Of course Libertarians believe in government, as the Constitution calls for it.  

But the morale of the story is that the average American is not very informed, nor do they have a long memories. It was just 10 to 15 years (2005) ago Republicans had congressional hearings about the need for more over-site on the housing market, namely Freddie and Fannie, but Democrats said no, "Everything is fine as long as poor people can buy homes they can't afford." 

We all know how that worked about. 

Even before then, almost every democrat wanted stronger enforcement on illegal immigration, and --- wait for it -- border walls, or I think they called them fences. I think they jumped the fence once they realized who those people were. Voters, and lots of them. 

But back to the story; she obviously believed that to vote Democrat was to protect the consumer. Believe me, Barack Obama, Nancy People, and Chuck Shumer don't give a shit about you. Nor does Paul Ryan or Mitch McConnell. Nor does that new socialist from New York, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s, who only cares where her first rent check is coming from, since she actually hasn't had a real job yet. (Sorry to you food servers, I didn't mean it like that.)

These people don't stand for you. They stand for power. And how to keep their power. They'll do anything to get re-elected. Doesn't matter which party they belong to. Shake up their system and they get pissed (oops, along comes Trump.) 

In future posts I may point out some these glaring facts, if you have a mind to read them. They do affect your net worth. You believe what you believe and you're not going to change that unless it affects you, your family or your pocketbook -- and try to tell me differently.

In the meantime, we'd better start getting ready for tomorrow's markets, because that affects my pocket book. And if you're along the for the ride, it affects yours. 

But please read my disclaimer first (in the upper right) about not being able to provide any "legal" advice. That's the politicians protecting their "rights" to provide that advice. Like I'd believe them. So screw the politicians. You know they have a rule for everything, including how you're supposed to apply your mailing label on a package. Look it up.

So now comes the next "holiday." Spend, spend, spend, Keep the economy growing. You do know that Jesus was born in the spring?

In the meantime, be nice to each other.


Popular posts from this blog

What happened when a Trump Supporter Challenged Me About the Wall

Vicky Alvear Schecter wrote in Medium | Poltics on Dec. 27, 2018 using her headline above. I thought it was pretty well written -- at least she made an attempt to keep her liberal bias out of it -- regardless of a few illogical fallacies

But she does make an attempt, in an effort to avoid her liberal bias, as she ponders  " order not to be accused by bias, I explained that I would only use conservative sources to prove my point."

To me, that's bias to start out with that premise. And I believe her premise is that she is against the wall. That's her stance. But she makes some good points, but some are skewed, even though she attempt to take a "conservative" approach, even by citing some "conservative" sources in her footnotes.

Here's the first problem: if she wanted to avoid bias, why not just stick to the the historical facts as written (when you can find them without bias), and not concern oneself with bias. "I must reject that becau…

Weekly wrap for Nov 9

After Thursday and Friday, it might seem the markets are down, but the weekly numbers tell a different story, with the three major indices up for the week. The Nasdaq, with its tech exposure, had the smallest increase. The tech sector is obviously under recent pressure. 

IndexNov 2Nov 9+/-%S&P 5002,723.062,781.01+ 57.95+ 2.12%Nasdaq7,356.997,406.90+ 49.91+ 0.67%DOW 3025,270.8325,989.30+ 718.47+ 2.84%
Over the last 12 months, the Dow is up 10.77 percent, the SP 500 up 7.6 percent, and the Nasdaq up 9.7 percent.  

The weekly chart of the SPY still indicates a long position in the broader market. (The blue line is the 34-week moving average; the red is the 13-week moving average).

While the U.S. economy still seems to be just fine from most reports, investors seemed to worry about a couple of things on Thursday and Friday: 1) The Eurozone, 2) trade with China, and 3) the Fed and interest rates. Another topic of interest has been oil. 

First, it seems that the Fed has really not indicated …

U.S. Top Oil Producer, Thanks to Obama

\ You read that right.

The U.S. is now the largest oil producer in the world, according to the EIA, producing some 15 million BOE per day, surpassing Russia and Saudi Arabia. (Remember back when Jimmy Carter said in 1979 the answer to our energy problems was to wear a warmer sweater...but you probably don't. He actually said this on national TV).

The United States is the top oil-producing country in the world, with an average of 14.86 million b/d, which accounts for 15.3% of the world's production. This is down from 15.12 million b/d in 2015, but it was enough to land the United States in the No. 1 spot, which it has held for the past four years running. (Source: Investopedia.)

Guess who takes credit for it? Granted, this increase in production began in 2012, but only because of private industry and the fact that the price of oil was at nearly all-time highs. And it dipped in 2016 because of Obama's anti-oil policies! 

But here he is again

Former President Barack Obama sure l…